Socio-economic outcome area 8Strong economic participation and development of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities
Target 8
By 2031, increase the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25-64 who are employed to 62%
Nationally in 2021, 55.7% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25–64 years were employed (figure CtG8.1).
This is an increase from 51.0% in 2016 (the baseline year).
Nationally, based on progress from the baseline, the target shows good improvement and is on track to be met. However, this assessment should be used with caution as it is based on a limited number of data points. Please refer to the How to interpret the data page for more information.
The state and territory assessments below reflect progress from the baseline (improvement, worsening or no change). There are no state and territory targets. The Australia assessment reflects progress from the baseline towards the national target.
NSW | Vic | Qld | WA | SA | Tas | ACT | NT | Aust | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Assessment of progress 2016 to 2021 |
improvement no change worsening no assessment available. improving and target on track to be met (Aust only). improving but target not on track to be met (Aust only).
Note: These assessments of progress should be used with caution as they are based on a limited number of data points.
Economic participation refers to engagement in work or other activity that provides access to economic resources (AIHW 2015). Economic development denotes improvements in wellbeing derived from those resources (McDonald et al. 2019). For tens of thousands of years, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have participated in economic activity according to their Lore/Law to sustainably fulfill the needs of their communities (Langton and Corn 2023). Traditional economic activity included hunting, fishing, foraging, storing and cultivating plants, managing the landscape and waterways for harvesting, and sharing resources between community members (Koungoulos et al. 2024; Pascoe and Gammage 2021; Rose et al. 2016). Long-distance trading was central to traditional economies, with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people crossing the continent along trade-routes and Songlines and exchanging resources with seafaring traders from Asia (Crabtree et al 2021; Langton 2006; Neale and Kelly 2020).
Today, Indigenous peoples have internationally recognised rights to be fully included in economic development efforts. Colonisation, however, has inhibited the ability of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to fully realise these rights (Coalition of Peaks 2025; Tauli-Corpuz 2014; UN 2007). Government policies have disrupted traditional economies by forcibly dispossessing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people of their lands and restricting their movement (Langton 2011). Systemic and interpersonal discrimination, exploitative working conditions and government control over employment and income have prevented Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from fully and freely engaging in the Western economic system (Coalition of Peaks 2025; Pearson 2021). These restrictions hinder wealth formation, limit access to resources and entrench economic inequality (Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs 2006; Liddle 2018).
Despite these historical and ongoing challenges, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander economy is flourishing. Research, conducted by the Dilin Duwa Centre at the University of Melbourne, shows there has been a 74% increase in the number of businesses operating in the Indigenous business sector between 2006 and 2018, a more than doubling of sector-wide gross income (Evans et al. 2024). The contribution of the Indigenous ecosystem to the Australian economy and community is far greater than the sum of its economic activities. These broader contributions include opportunities for Indigenous employment and self-determination, intergenerational wealth generation, sharing of Indigenous knowledge, provision of culturally sensitive services to communities and trust-building within the community (Evans et al. 2024). Research also shows that Indigenous businesses are up to 100 times more likely to hire an Indigenous employees compared to non‑Indigenous businesses (Supply Nation and First Australians Capital 2018).
Meaningful economic participation promotes and supports improved physical health and emotional wellbeing by expanding access to health services, overcoming financial barriers to housing and breaking cycles of poverty (AIHW 2024; Hunter et al. 2022). A consistent income stream, whether through secure employment or entrepreneurial activity, can provide Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people with greater certainty and economic agency (AIHW 2024; Collins and Norman 2018; Eva et al. 2024). Benefits from these forms of economic participation can also flow to individuals’ families and communities through employment opportunities, communal social networks and intergenerational wealth accumulation (Norman 2021; Eva et al. 2023). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have continuously pursued equitable economic participation through efforts like organising job walk-offs, protesting for equality and seeking restitution and remedy through the legal system (Liddle 2018; Norman 2021; Street v State of Western Australia [2024] FCA 1368).
Many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people still face ongoing structural barriers to economic participation and development, such as institutionalised racism, intergenerational disadvantage and systematic undervaluation of traditional activity (Liddle 2018; Manero et al. 2022; QAHIC 2023). Geographic constraints, higher rates of disability, inappropriate education and training, lack of capital and investment, and limited access to culturally safe opportunities can also act as barriers (Commonwealth of Australia 2023; Dodson 2009; Evans et al. 2024; House of Representatives Standing Committee on Indigenous Affairs 2021). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have continued to strengthen their engagement in the economy despite these difficulties, with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander business activity and employment expanding significantly and materially benefiting communities (Evans et al. 2024).
In addition to the growth of employment and Indigenous‑owned businesses, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have established opportunities to participate in the Western economy by performing traditional economic and cultural activity (Langton 2011). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities can earn incomes while strengthening culture and protecting their connections to Country (ATNS nd; Norman 2024; Quiggin and Quiggin 2007; Spencer et al. 2016). The contributions of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander economic ecosystem extend beyond the economy to the preservation and sharing of Indigenous knowledges and traditions, the provision of trusted and culturally safe services, and the reinforcement of independence and autonomy (Evans et al. 2024).
Meaningful economic participation and development are central to self-determination, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have the right to define and pursue their own self-determined economic development priorities (Coalition of Peaks nd; Eva et al. 2024). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people continue to take action and collaborate with governments to help ensure greater economic participation and development opportunities occur for individuals and communities (Coalition of Peaks 2025). Further efforts that would support improved Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander economic participation and development include:
- educational support to increase senior secondary and tertiary qualification attainments that improve meaningful employment outcomes (NCVER 2023; Venn 2018)
- local employment programs and promotion of culturally inclusive education and workplaces to increase workforce participation (Liddle 2018; Eva et al. 2023)
- commercial education programs, financial assistance, logistical support, investment incentives and trading partnerships to increase the prevalence and success of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-owned enterprises at home and abroad (Brimble et al 2024; Collins and Norman 2018; ILSC 2022)
- comprehensive Indigenous Cultural and Intellectual Property and cultural rights legislation to protect communities against unethical conduct and reinforce the productive value of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures (Janke 2021; PC 2022)
- stronger land ownership rights and legal and financial assistance to Traditional Owners when negotiating agreements to increase economic opportunities and self-determination for communities on Country (Campbell and Hunt 2013).
AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) 2024, 2.07 Employment, AIHW Indigenous HPF, (accessed 3 January 2025).
ATNS (Agreements, Treaties and Negotiated Settlements) nd, Economic development and native title, Agreements, Treaties and Negotiated Settlements, (accessed 9 January 2025).
Brimble, M, Weaven, S, Wildman, K, Blue, L, Bodle, K and Frazer, L 2024, ‘Examining the financial and commercial literacy of Australian Indigenous small business owners’, Accounting and Finance, Early View, p. 1–24.
Campbell, D and Hunt, J 2013, ‘Achieving broader benefits from Indigenous land use agreements: community development in Central Australia’, Community Development Journal, vol. 48, no. 2, p. 197–214.
Coalition of Peaks 2025, Informing a partnership on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander economic development engagement report, (accessed 8 April 2025).
Coalition of Peaks nd, Economic development partnership: Informing the First Nations Economic Development Partnership, (accessed 8 April 2025).
Collins, J and Norman, H 2018, ‘Indigenous entrepreneurship and Indigenous employment in Australia’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, no. 82, p. 149–170.
Commonwealth of Australia 2023, Royal Commission into violence, abuse, neglect and exploitation of people with disability final report volume 9: First Nations people with disability.
Crabtree, S, White, D, Bradshaw, C, Saltré, F, Williams, A, Beaman, R, Bird, M, and Ulm, S 2021, ‘Landscape rules predict optimal superhighways for the first peopling of Sahul’, Nature Human Behaviour, vol. 5, p. 1303–1313.
Dodson, M 2010 ‘Challenges and Opportunities in Australian Indigenous Education’, in Snyder, I. and Nieuwenuysen, J. (eds), Closing the gap in education? Improving outcomes in southern world societies, Monash University Publishing, pp. 20–27.
Eva, C, Bodle, K, Foley, D, Harris, J, and Hunter, B 2023, ‘The importance of understanding Indigenous employment in the Indigenous business sector’, Australian Journal of Social Issues vol. 58, p. 494–522.
Eva, C, Harris, J, Bodle, K, Foley, D, Hunter, B and Nichols, N 2024, ‘“It's Self-Determination. Blackfullas Making Right Decisions for Blackfullas”: Why Indigenous-owned businesses create better Indigenous employment outcomes’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, vol. 59, p. 29–56.
Evans, M, Polidano, C, Dahmann, C, Kalera, Y, Ruiz, M, Moschion, J, and Blackman, M 2024, ‘Indigenous Business and Corporation Snapshot Study 3.0’, The University of Melbourne.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Indigenous Affairs 2021, Report on Indigenous Participation in Employment and Business.
Hunter, B, Dinku, Y, Eva, C, Markham, F and Murray, M 2022, ‘Employment and Indigenous mental health’, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Produced for the Indigenous Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Clearinghouse. Catalogue number IMH 10, AIHW, Australian Government.
Indigenous Land and Sea Corporation (ILSC) 2022, ‘Discussion Paper: Indigenous-led trade, export and investment’, National Indigenous Land and Sea Strategy.
Janke, T 2021, True tracks: Respecting Indigenous knowledge and culture, University of New South Wales Press.
Koungoulos, L, Balme, J, O’Connor, S, and Ingrey, S 2024, ‘Late Holocene hunting economies in coastal southeastern Australia: Insights from the archaeological fauna of Curracurrang 1 Rockshelter, Royal National Park’, Archaeology in Oceania, vol. 59, p. 305–381.
Langton, M 2011, ‘Anthropology, Politics and the Changing World of Aboriginal Australians’, Anthropological Forum, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 1–22.
Langton, M and Corn, A 2023, Law: The way of the ancestors, Thames & Hudson.
Langton, M, Mazel, O and Palmer, L 2006, ‘The ‘Spirit’ of the Thing: The Boundaries of Aboriginal Economic Relations at Australian Common Law’, The Australian Journal of Anthropology, vol. 17, no. 3, p. 307–321.
Liddle, C 2018, ‘Introduction – Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Employment Policies and Repeating Colonial Histories’, Journal of Australian Political Economy, no. 82, pp. 5–8.
Manero, A, Taylor, K, Nikolakis, W, Adamowicz, W, Marshall, V, Spencer-Cotton, A, Nguyen, M and Grafton, R 2022, ‘A systematic literature review of non-market valuation of Indigenous peoples’ values: Current knowledge, best-practice and framing questions for future research’, Ecosystem Services, vol. 54, 101417.
McDonald, C, Moreno-Monroy, A and Springare, LS 2019, ‘Indigenous economic development and well-being in a place-based context’, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, vol. 2019/1.
NCVER (National Centre for Vocational Education Research) 2023, From VET to sustainable employment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
Neale, M and Kelly, L 2020, Songlines: The Power and Promise, Thames & Hudson.
Norman, H 2021 ‘Aboriginal worlds and Australian capitalism’, Labour History, no. 121, p. 57–72.
Norman, H 2024, ‘Cultural care and Aboriginal land rights in New South Wales’, Australian Journal of Social Issues, vol. 59, p. 297–315.
Pascoe, B and Gammage, B 2021, Country: Future fire, future farming. Thames & Hudson.
Pearson, N 2021, Mission: Essays, speeches & ideas, Black Inc.
PC (Productivity Commission) 2022, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander visual arts and crafts: Study report.
QAIHC (Queensland Aboriginal and Islander Health Council) 2023, Submission: Nature and extent of poverty.
Quiggin, R and Quiggin, J 2007, ‘Intellectual property and Indigenous culture’, Australian Public Policy Program Working Paper: P07 no. 1, (accessed 8 January 2025).
Rose, D, Bell, D and Crook, D 2016, ‘Restoring habitat and cultural practice in Australia’s oldest and largest traditional aquaculture system’, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, vol. 26, p. 589–600.
Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs 2006, Unfinished business: Indigenous stolen wages.
Spencer, R, Brueckner, M, Wise, G and Marika, B 2016, ‘Australian Indigenous social enterprise: measuring performance’, Journal of Enterprising Communities, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 397–424.
Street v State of Western Australia [2024] FCA 1368.
Supply Nation and First Australians Capital 2018, Indigenous business growth: Working together to realise potential.
Tauli-Corpuz, V 2014, ‘Report of the Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council on the rights of indigenous peoples’, United Nations General Assembly, doc A/69/267.
UN (United Nations) 2007, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Venn, D 2018 ‘Indigenous youth employment and the school-to-work transition’, Australian journal of labour economics, vol. 21, no. 3, p. 210–228.
By sex
Nationally in 2021, a higher proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander males aged 25–64 years were employed (57.7%) compared to females (53.8%) (figure CtG8.2). The proportions increased by around four percentage points for males and around six percentage points for females since the 2016 baseline year.
By age group
Nationally in 2021, the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who were employed was similar across the five-year age groups for people aged 25 to less than 50 years (between 57.4% to 58.8%). From 50 years of age the employment rate declined with each five-year age group, down to 41.0% for people aged 60-64 years (figure CtG8.3). This follows a similar pattern to the 2016 baseline year. From 2016 to 2021, the employment rate increased for all five-year age groups.
By remoteness area
Nationally in 2021, the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25–64 years who were employed was highest in major cities (62.1%) (figure CtG8.4). The proportions declined as remoteness increased, down to 35.0% for people living in very remote areas. Since the 2016 baseline year, the employment rate increased in all areas, except for people living in very remote areas where it decreased (less than one percentage point).
By Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage (IRSD) quintile
Nationally in 2021, the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25–64 years who were employed was highest in the least disadvantaged socio‑economic areas of Australia (80.8%) (figure CtG8.5). The proportions declined in more disadvantaged areas, down to 41.8% for people living in the most disadvantaged socio‑economic areas of Australia. The proportions have increased in all socio‑economic areas since the 2016 baseline year.
By disability status
Nationally in 2021, 14.2% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25–64 years with a need for assistance with core activities were employed, compared to 61.7% who did not have a need for assistance (figure CtG8.6). The proportions increased by around two percentage points for people with a need for assistance with core activities and around five percentage points for persons who did not have a need for assistance, since the 2016 baseline year.
By level of highest educational attainment
Nationally in 2021, the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25–64 years who were employed generally increased with higher educational attainment, ranging from 25.4% for those who had attained Secondary Education – Years nine and below to 87.2% for those who had obtained a qualification at the Postgraduate degree level (figure CtG8.7). This follows a similar pattern to the 2016 baseline year.
By type of employment
Nationally in 2021, 34.0% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25–64 years were employed full‑time (an increase of around two percentage points since the 2016 baseline), compared to 16.1% who were employed part‑time (an increase of around one percentage point since the 2016 baseline) (table CtG8A.8). A further 5.6% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people were employed and away from work (an increase of around two percentage points since the 2016 baseline).
Target 8: Increase the proportion of people who are employed
Outcome: | Strong economic participation and development of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and communities. |
---|---|
Target: | By 2031, increase the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25–64 who are employed to 62%. |
Indicator: | The proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25–64 years who are employed. |
Measure: | The measure is defined as: Numerator – number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 25–64 years who are employed Denominator – total number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the population aged 25–64 years and is presented as a percentage. |
Target established: | National Agreement on Closing the Gap July 2020 |
Latest dashboard update: | 15 June 2023 |
Indicator type: | Target |
Interpretation of change: | A high or increasing proportion is desirable. |
Data source: | Name: ABS Census of Population and Housing, Census Table Builder (Basic) Frequency: Five‑yearly Documentation (links): ABS - Census |
Data provider: | Provider name: Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) Provider area: Census |
Baseline year: | 2016 |
Latest reporting period: | 2021 |
Target year: | 2031 |
Disaggregations: | State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status. State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by sex. State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by remoteness area. State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by Index of Relative Socio‑economic Disadvantage (IRSD) quintile. State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by disability status. State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by age. State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by level of education. State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by type of employment. |
Computation: | Numerator divided by Denominator multiplied by 100. Counting rules The data is for all Australian residents enumerated in the Census that reported having a usual residence in Australia. Geographical variables are based on a person’s place of usual residence (on Census night). Includes (both numerator and denominator):
Excludes (both numerator and denominator):
Disaggregations: Sex refers to a person’s biological characteristics. The 2021 Census allowed all respondents to select from three response options for the sex question: male, female and non‑binary sex. Where a respondent has provided a male or female response and a non‑binary sex response, the male or female response was used to determine a binary sex variable. Otherwise, sex was derived by a statistical process using random allocation. Remoteness area is classified according to the ABS Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) using SA1 as the building block. For people with incomplete/invalid or missing address information, the ABS imputes the place of usual residence. The non‑response rate at the SA1 level was 4.4% in 2021. Remoteness area disaggregations exclude ‘Migratory – Offshore – Shipping’ and ‘No usual address’. Please see the How to interpret the data page for more information. Socio‑economic status of the locality is classified according to the ABS Socio‑Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA): Index of Relative Socio‑economic Disadvantage (IRSD), using SA1 as the building block. For people with incomplete/invalid or missing address information, the ABS will impute the place of usual residence. The data is reported by IRSD quintile, which is determined at the Australian level and excludes persons with unknown or unavailable SEIFA score. Some individual geographic areas were excluded from SEIFA for various reasons, such as low population or high non‑response to certain Census questions. Please see the How to interpret the data page for more information. Disability is classified according to core activity need for assistance. The data is only available for people with a profound or severe core activity limitation. Disability data sourced from the Census is based on four questions to identify need for assistance and may not be fully comparable with data from other sources. See ABS - Ausstats for more information. (Data for people whose ‘need for assistance with core activities’ was not stated is provided for context.) Age is derived from a person’s date of birth. If date of birth is not stated, an age value is imputed by the ABS. Level of education is derived from the highest level of educational attainment, whether it be a school or non‑school qualification (persons with inadequately described or not stated educational attainment have been included as a category combined with no educational attainment). Type of employment classifies employed persons as working full time (worked 35 hours or more), part time or away from work in the week prior to Census night. Persons who were employed but away from work includes persons who were employed but did not work any hours in the week prior to Census night or did not state the number of hours worked. Extraction Census Table Builder (Basic) – Employment, Income and Education: INGP X Main ASGS (UR) X LFSP X AGE5P [Disaggregations: SEXP; REMOTE (UR); IRSD; ASSNP; AGE5P; HEAP; LFSP]. |
Data quality considerations: | All data values have been randomly adjusted using perturbation to avoid the release of confidential data. Proportions/rates calculated for small populations should be used with caution. In 2016 and 2021 data, people who participated in Community Development Program (CDP) received income support payments directly from the government and were not considered to be in an employer/employee relationship with their provider. They were classified as not employed unless they had a non‑CDP job. |
Driver
- Highest level of educational attainment
- Long term health and disability status
- Caring responsibilities
Contextual information
- Employment by occupation
- Employment by industry
- Median equivalised gross household income
- Median personal income
- Labour force participation
- Self-managed business owners
- Progress towards parity
Material for download
To assist with interpretation of the data provided (Excel data tables and CSV dataset) please refer to the target data specification (above) and the indicator data specifications (provided in each supporting indicator page – linked above).