Socio-economic outcome area 12
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are not overrepresented in the child protection system

Target 12

By 2031, reduce the rate of overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children (0–17 years old) in out-of-home care by 45%

Nationally in 2024, the rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged 0–17 years in out‑of‑home care was 50.3 per 1,000 children in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population (figure CtG12.1).

The 2024 rate is the same as the rate in 2023, and it is an increase from 47.3 per 1,000 children in 2019 (the baseline year).

Nationally, based on progress from the baseline, the target is worsening. This assessment is provided with a high level of confidence. Please refer to the How to interpret the data page for more information.

The state and territory assessments below reflect progress from the baseline (improvement, worsening or no change). There are no state and territory targets. The Australia assessment reflects progress from the baseline towards the national target.

NSWVicQldWASATasACTNTAust
Assessment of progress
2019 to 2024
Confidence level
High
High
High
Low
High
Low
Low
High
High

 improvement   no change   worsening no assessment available. improving and target on track to be met (Aust only). improving but target not on track to be met (Aust only).

Note: These assessments of progress are provided with a 'High' or 'Low' level of confidence. An assessment reported with a High level of confidence is considered to be more reliable than one reported with a Low level of confidence. Please see the 'How to interpret the data' page for more information.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are nurtured within rich and supportive familial and cultural environments but often encounter significant challenges when exposed to the child protection system and removal from their families (AHRC 1997; Martin 2017; Martin and Walter 2017). This has profound effects on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities as it can lead to a loss of cultural identity and connection to Country, family and kinship which are pillars of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander wellbeing (Bourke et al. 2018; Miller et al. 2020; SNAICC et al. 2023).

The continued overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in the child protection system stems from several historical, enduring and interrelated factors. These factors include intergenerational trauma originating from colonisation, systemic racism, inequality across social determinants of child wellbeing, and the laws, policies and practices that operate to the detriment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people (Darwin et al. 2023; QFCC 2021; SNAICC et al. 2023).

The removal of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children contributes to poorer outcomes in relation to health, education, housing and employment (AIHW 2018; Healing Foundation 2013). There is also a link between out-of-home care, juvenile justice and the over-incarceration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults in the criminal justice system (ALRC 2017).

Factors that may reduce the over-representation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in the child protection system include:

  • Addressing social and economic determinants, including poverty, homelessness, and educational attainment (Central Australian Aboriginal Congress 2021; De Bortoli et al. 2015). These are primary reasons families encounter the child protection system (CACYP 2023; SNAICC 2023).
  • Enabling self-determination through Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander-led service provision (Creamer et al. 2022). This involves adequately resourcing Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Community Controlled Organisations to provide culturally safe prevention and early support services and transitioning services away from statutory child protection agencies to ACCOs, where decision making authority is transferred to a delegated Aboriginal authority (SNAICC et al. 2023).
  • Eliminating institutional racism and discrimination in child protection (SNAICC et al. 2023). This is particularly with respect to the implicit and explicit bias at decision-making points along the child protection continuum (QFCC 2021)
  • Systemic changes to colonial child removal paradigms that fail to understand the context and dynamics of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families (Yoorrook Justice Commission 2023)
  • Recognising the Child Placement Principle as the best practice approach across the continuum of interactions with the child protection system (SNAICC 2018)
  • Implementing diversion of children and families to a more culturally-responsive secondary service system, which includes supports such as counselling, parenting programs and specialist services targeted at vulnerable families (QFCC 2021; Queensland Child Protection Commission of Inquiry 2013)
  • Providing access to culturally-responsive, trauma-aware, healing-informed supports to restore cultural connections (Healing Foundation 2019).

The forced removal of children from family and culture, implemented under the guise of care and protection, led to the Stolen Generations (Menzies 2019). Intergenerational trauma and the enduring impacts of removing children from their families continue to be felt. Despite the historical and ongoing impacts of colonisation, intergenerational trauma and racism, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families remain resilient (Miller et al. 2020).

AHRC (Australian Human Rights Commission) 1997, Bringing them Home Report.

AIHW (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare) 2018, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Stolen Generations and Descendants: Numbers, Demographic Characteristics and Selected Outcomes , Cat. no. IHW 195, Canberra.

ALRC (Australian Law Reform Commission) 2017, Pathways to Justice - An Inquiry into the Incarceration Rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples , December.

Bourke, S, Wright, A, Guthrie, J, Russell, L, Dunbar, T and Lovett, R 2018, ‘Evidence Review of Indigenous Culture for Health and Wellbeing’, The International Journal of Health, Wellness, and Society , vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 11–27.

Central Australian Aboriginal Congress. ‘PDF documentResportment of Social Snse to the Depaervices Consultation Paper: Implementing the Successor Plan to the National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children 2009-2020’, 2021.

CACYP (Commissioner for Aboriginal Children and Young People) 2023, ‘The Inquiry into the Application of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Placement Principle in the Removal and Placement of Aboriginal Children in South Australia’.

Creamer, S, Blair, S, Toombs, M and Brolan, CE 2022, ‘Indigenous services leading the way for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out-of-home care’, Social Work Education , pp. 1–25. Darwin, L, Vervoort, S, Vollert, E and Blustein, S 2023, Intergenerational trauma and mental health , Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.

Darwin, L, Vervoort, S, Vollert, E and Blustein, S 2023, Intergenerational trauma and mental health, AIHW.

De Bortoli, Lillian, Jan Coles, and Mairead Dolan. ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children in Child Protection: A Sample from the Victorian Children’s Court’. Journal of Social Work 15, no. 2 (March 2015): 186–206.

Healing Foundation 2013, Our Children, Our Dreaming: A Call for a More Just Approach for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Families.

—— 2019, A Theory of Change for Healing, (accessed 28 May 2024).

Martin, K 2017, ‘It’s special and it’s specific: understanding the early childhood education experiences and expectations of young Indigenous Australian children and their parents’, The Australian Educational Researcher , vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 89–105.

Martin, K and Walter, M 2017, 'The Story of LSIC: It’s All about Trust and Vision.' In Indigenous Children Growing Up Strong: A Longitudinal Study of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Families , edited by Walter, M, Martin, K and Bodkin-Andrews, G, United Kingdom: Palgrave McMillan.

Menzies, K 2019, ‘Understanding the Australian Aboriginal experience of collective, historical and intergenerational trauma’, International Social Work , vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1522–1534.

Miller, HM, Young, C, Nixon, J, Talbot‐McDonnell, M, Cutmore, M, Tong, A, Craig, JC and Woolfenden, S 2020, ‘Parents’ and carers’ views on factors contributing to the health and wellbeing of urban Aboriginal children’, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health , vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 265–270.

Queensland Child Protection Commission of Inquiry. ‘PDF documentTaking Responsibility: A Roadmap for Queensland Child Protection’, 2013.

QPCC (Queensland Family and Child Commission) 2021, Principle Focus - A child-rights approach to systemic accountability for the safety and wellbeing of Queensland’s First Nations children .

Queensland Child Protection Commission of Inquiry 2013, Taking Responsibility: A Roadmap for Queensland Child Protection .

SNAICC 2018, PDF documentThe Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Placement Principle: A Guide to Support Implementation, (accessed 28 May 2024).

SNAICC, Family Matters Leadership Group, Monash University, and University of Technology Sydney 2023, Family Matters Report 2023 .

Yoorrook Justice Commission 2023, Report into Victoria’s Child Protection and Criminal Justice Systems .


Data tables appear under figures
This selection applies to all figures/tables below:

By sex

Nationally in 2024, the rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged 0–17 years in out‑of‑home care was similar for males and females (50.4 and 50.1 per 1,000 population respectively) (figure CtG12.2).

By age group

Nationally in 2024, rates for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out‑of‑home care varied by age group. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged 10–14 years and 5–9 years had the highest rates of out‑of‑home care (57.7 and 56.5 per 1,000 children respectively), followed by youth aged 15-17 years (48.5 per 1,000 children). Infants aged under one year had the lowest rate (21.4 per 1,000 children) (figure CtG12.3).

By disability status

Nationally in 2024, 22.7% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children in out-of-home care had a reported disability (figure CtG12.4). However, this proportion needs to be considered with caution as there is a large proportion of children (30.4%) for whom disability status is unknown (figure CtG12.4).

Target 12: Reduce the rate of children in out-of-home care

Outcome:Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children are not overrepresented in the child protection system.
Target:By 2031, reduce the rate of overrepresentation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children (0–17 years old) in out‑of‑home care by 45%.
Indicator:The rate of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged 0–17 years in out‑of‑home care.
Measure:

This measure is defined as:

Numerator – number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged 0–17 years in out‑of‑home care, at 30 June

Denominator – number of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children aged 0–17 years in the population, at 30 June

and is presented as a rate per 1,000 children.

Target established:National Agreement on Closing the Gap July 2020
Latest dashboard update:30 July 2025
Indicator type:Target
Interpretation of change:A low or decreasing rate is desirable.
Data source(s):

Name (numerator all and denominator for data by disability status): Child Protection National Minimum Data Set (CP NMDS)

Frequency: Annual

Name (denominator): Estimates and Projections for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population

Frequency: Annual (data updated for all years in the March 2025 Dashboard update)

Documentation (links): AIHW - child-protection

ABS - Estimates and projections, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians.

Data provider:

Provider name (numerator): Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW)

Provider area: Child protection

Provider name (denominator): Australian Bureau of Statistics

Provider area: Demography

Baseline year:2019 (data updated in March 2025)
Latest reporting period:2024
Target year:2031 (data updated in March 2025)
Disaggregations:

State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status.

State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by sex.

State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by age.

State and territory and Australia, by Indigenous status, by disability status.

Computation:

Numerator divided by Denominator multiplied by 1,000.

Counting rules

Includes (numerator):

  • Children in out‑of‑home care including where a financial payment was offered but declined by the carer.

Excludes (numerator):

  • People for whom Indigenous status was not stated.

Denominator (excluding disability status):

  • The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population is calculated from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population estimates and projections at 30 June of the reference period (medium series).
  • The non-Indigenous population is calculated by subtracting the 30 June Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population from the 30 June total population (except for the most recent year, where the population at 31 March is used for the total population).

Numerator (disability status):

  • The number of children with disability in out‑of‑home care at 30 June.

Denominator (disability status):

  • Number of children aged 0–17 years in out-of-home care at 30 June.

Disaggregations:

  • Sex relates to biological primary sexual characteristics, as reported by a person or as determined by an interviewer. Children classified as having an ‘indeterminate/not stated’ sex are excluded from the analysis by sex.
  • Age is based on date of birth where known but can also be collect directly or estimated. Children with unknown age are excluded from the analysis by age.
  • Disability is an indicator that a disability is experienced, and is recorded as yes (with disability), no (without disability) or not stated/inadequately described (disability status unknown). There are high proportions of children with ‘disability status unknown’ so these proportions are reported separately as part of the analysis. Disability is a multidimensional and complex concept and differences may exist across jurisdictions in how disability is defined. There are also differences in how information about disability is captured in jurisdictional processes and client information systems.

Supporting calculations

Data quality considerations:

2019 (to 30 June) was the first year that a single nationally consistent definition of out‑of‑home care has been applied across all states and territories. Prior to this, reporting of out‑of‑home care was not nationally consistent, and therefore historical data are not provided for this target.

Data by Indigenous status are influenced by the quality of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander identification of young people in the CP NMDS (not stated categories are reported separately in the data table).

From 2022, the Australian Capital Territory and the Northen Territory have adopted a policy of suppressing numbers below five and AIHW has applied additional suppression. 

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population rates reported for this target have been revised down compared to previous reporting on the dashboard. This follows from the release of 2021 Census-based Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population data, which showed a substantial increase in the estimated population over the time series. Please refer to the How to interpret the data page for more information.

Comparisons of population rates should be used with caution. Increasing out-of-home care rates may reflect improving identification within administrative data, rather than changes in underlying out-of-home care rates. Please refer to the How to interpret the data page for more information.

Disaggregations:

  • Disability status: data is reported as a proportion of children in out‑of‑home care by their disability status, providing a different measure to other reporting for this target. Caution should be used when comparing data by disability status. There are differences in how disability is captured across jurisdictions. There are also high proportions of children with ‘disability status unknown’. 
Future reporting:

Future reporting will seek to include the following additional disaggregations:

  • disability status calculated as a rate per 1,000 children in the population by disability status (as per the target measure).

Driver

Contextual information

Material for download

To assist with interpretation of the data provided (Excel data tables and CSV dataset) please refer to the target data specification (above) and the indicator data specifications (provided in each supporting indicator page – linked above).